Seven Modes of Uncertainty
Associate Professor of English Namwali Serpells research interests include the relationship between aesthetic reception, affect, and ethics in contemporary fiction and film. Two ideas often taken for granted are, literature is rife with uncertainty and literature is good for us. But what is the relationship between literatures capacity to unsettle, perplex, and bewilder us, and literatures ethical value? To revive this question, Serpell proposes a return to William Empsons groundbreaking work, Seven Types of Ambiguity (1930), which contends that literary uncertainty is crucial to ethics because it pushes us beyond the limits of our own experience. Taking as case studies experimental novels by Thomas Pynchon, Toni Morrison, Bret Easton Ellis, Ian McEwan, Elliot Perlman, Tom McCarthy, and Jonathan Safran Foer, Serpell suggests that literary uncertainty emerges from the readers shifting responses to structures of conflicting information. To explain how these structures produce uncertainty, Serpell borrows from cognitive psychology the concept of affordance, which describes an objects or environments potential uses and offers a new phenomenology of how we read uncertainty now. After an introduction by Katie Fleishman (Ph.D. Candidate, English), Serpell will speak briefly about her book and then open the floor for discussion.
Geballe Room, 220 Stephens Hall
Wednesday, February 22, 2017
Townsend Center for the Humanities